Basingstoke - Another mom agrees: "The principal and the teachers knew that to make the design was another girl." According to the witnesses were aware even before the report made to social services, which led to separation from the family of the child "wrong" and his little brother.
should continue the process that the defendants the school principal and two teachers, a psychologist and a social worker for the odyssey of two children who were snatched in Basildon for over two months the affection of their parents and forced to live in a shelter because of a daring design made by another pupil.
hearing on 16 / 2, as well as the mother of one of the students confirmed that they are aware that the faculty of the school was aware of the 'error' on the drawing before the court to issue the decision which removed the siblings to their family, the educator has also deposed that followed more closely the brother greater when the child was brought to the community. He also confirmed the strong condition of discomfort in that small non-family context. In the new hearing on
process will be heard the psychologist expert of the prosecution and one that stretched to the juvenile court perzo the office that led finally to archiving the case. The design was found under the counter of the little girl of nine years in February 2008 and March 14 she and her 13 year old brother were taken away from parents on the provision of social services and the City, who had taken up the recommendation of the school.
Small were thus assigned to a shelter where they stayed for 69 days before returning to embrace their parents. In the process, the principal and the teachers respond to perjury because they would continue to support, front investigators, that the drawing was removed while the child knew that it had been his companion.
The school director is also accused of false ideology because, according to the reconstruction of the prosecution, in the immediacy of the events he wrote a report sent to social services which supported the official version but sapendola false.
The social worker and psychologist difendendono bodily harm by the accused against the brother more because, according to the prosecution, would create a serious trauma in the child at the time of removal from their parents, March 14, 2008, between the 'Another day of his birthday, telling him that would change the family and trying to get him to confirm the suspicions created by the design. All the accused have always denied: that he has known the truth, whether he had lobbied for him to be confirmed. Mario Consani
should continue the process that the defendants the school principal and two teachers, a psychologist and a social worker for the odyssey of two children who were snatched in Basildon for over two months the affection of their parents and forced to live in a shelter because of a daring design made by another pupil.
hearing on 16 / 2, as well as the mother of one of the students confirmed that they are aware that the faculty of the school was aware of the 'error' on the drawing before the court to issue the decision which removed the siblings to their family, the educator has also deposed that followed more closely the brother greater when the child was brought to the community. He also confirmed the strong condition of discomfort in that small non-family context. In the new hearing on
process will be heard the psychologist expert of the prosecution and one that stretched to the juvenile court perzo the office that led finally to archiving the case. The design was found under the counter of the little girl of nine years in February 2008 and March 14 she and her 13 year old brother were taken away from parents on the provision of social services and the City, who had taken up the recommendation of the school.
The school director is also accused of false ideology because, according to the reconstruction of the prosecution, in the immediacy of the events he wrote a report sent to social services which supported the official version but sapendola false.
The social worker and psychologist difendendono bodily harm by the accused against the brother more because, according to the prosecution, would create a serious trauma in the child at the time of removal from their parents, March 14, 2008, between the 'Another day of his birthday, telling him that would change the family and trying to get him to confirm the suspicions created by the design. All the accused have always denied: that he has known the truth, whether he had lobbied for him to be confirmed. Mario Consani
Source: ilgiorno.it
0 comments:
Post a Comment