Coconut Oil,broken Capillaries

and maintenance service. A non-application of the law

Family and individual Claudia Moretti (05/01/2009)


are now three years (now 5 ed) that in Italy we have a law, in case of separation of the spouses (or de facto separation of unmarried parents), the minor children are entrusted "to both parents", except in exceptional cases of shared custody.

What do you mean? It means that the child has no more ', as he had always, a parent (basically the mother) to live with and the other "visit" to pre-set times in days. The Law 54/2006, after years of development, it marries the full line of both parents ', and that there' a parent who has duties, rights, duties or responsibilities 'more, on the assumption that neither of them can' escape to the report, even daily with their children.

The object 'to the interests of the child relationship with both father and mother, in fact, and has pushed the legislature to restore fairness' of the roles of mother and father not just about the time of attending the same, but also the burdens of maintaining. If until 2006 was granted that the custodial parent (usually the mother) have a maintenance for the care of children living with her, and according to that story after the check has no more 'reason for being: both can and must do so directly and personally.


The choice and 'undoubtedly revolutionary in a country where the female figure and still' in reference to raising children, as well as' the parent at the end on which falls the burden and honor of parental relationship. And it is' undeniable that in a similar social and cultural context, the child support has fulfilled the function of protection worthy of the mother-and children-on the possible lack of interest or at least of the least self-empowerment of the father against the children.


For many fathers, the check was an excuse to abdicate its role of protagonist in the relationship with their children, a lump of money, time, attention and care of material derived from the parent. For many others, and it 'this is the engine that has encouraged if not determined the legislative news, however, what' has indirectly made an unjust deprivation of a role, which, in spite of themselves, were ousted.


The choice of maintaining direct dependents of both parents not only has indeed reasons accounting, which translate into monetary terms, the trend in equality of time and cost of attendance of children for each of the two, but finds its reason in determining the primary mode 'of compulsory direct care and emotional support materials, education , education, already 'on the Civil Code. In other words, between personally buy a book, a dress, pay for a school trip or a medical examination, and reimburse the other parent at the end or beginning of the month, and we 'decided (except exceptions) that the obligation parental be done properly in the first way, and only a residual and exceptional in the second.


This 'and that' was so 'laid down by statute, however, and' almost 'constantly upheld in court.


To date, there will be few who observe the precept of regulatory decisions by giving each parent the primary role of protagonist in the relationship with their children, without the other powers in return for child support.


This 'can be a symptom of a society' still slow to recognize the equality of man and woman related to child rearing, and distrust that still show a certain group of fathers that until recently was very happy to delegate to his mother the direct care of their children. However, it may also be a symptom of something more ', that is a worm intrinsic to the law number 54. The both parents' working as designed and initiated by the legislature, requires an equal division of time of attendance of individual parents with their children, and more. Presupposes two nuclei around which carries the life of the lesser two places where it makes its personality ', in terms of education, socializing, conducting activities' games or sports, etc. ... two words " case" , also " home . This 'is not only' infrequently as possible from a practical point of view, but could, if not artfully handled, set up for the minor disability, a limit on the growth, which for tossing and 'so' subject.


Perhaps this pushes the judges appointed to fulfill the decisions on joint custody to opt for a system of "custody to both parents" with a clearance at the right and duty to visit with the other , charged with the child support for the latter.

That ', of course, makes the law a dead letter n.54.


[Source http://avvertenze.aduc.it/famiglia/affidamento+entrambi+genitori+mantenimento+diretto_15620.php ]