inequality creates conflict, now everybody knows that. And if everyone knows everything but is still far from the necessary awareness that the male is currently politically, culturally, socially discriminated against: the terrible power of the victim to create and index shows manipulated by all politics of feminism in recent decades has meant that " Male "became synonymous with bad, and that this negative starts to have full dignity of belonging to mankind.
In Italy, as in other foreign countries, for example, allegations of sexual violence implies the reversal of the burden of proof. In other words, complainant's statements are in fact proof of the complaint herself. This expresses, no doubt, the serious problems of a society 'that would ensure equal' rights to all its citizens, safeguarding the hypothesis that it is always innocent until proven otherwise. And you can not 'be guilty, where evidence of guilt for an offense which carries up to ten years in prison is an act which is the prosecution's proof of its truth'. Allow such self 'in an anthropological problem that is usually (because it concerns the complaints of women against uommini) implies - simply - it is no longer the hypothesis that humanity 'is just one.
When in years in which the Italian women's movement trembled for the implementation of laws that support women's claims there was no form of male aggregation in a position to "negotiate" those claims and I believe that is enough common ground instances Feminists were received in the absence of any real adversarial men / women. As a result, the implementation of completely new rules and practices could take place without the need for 'a particular mediation.
Moreover, the male world as was caught by surprise by the huge bubble that was feminism and that, along with the sexual liberation brought in from the beginning itself and a huge load of accusations against the male world responsible, at least in the eyes of those who supported the movement, centuries and centuries marked by unjust social attitudes and not equalitari particularly oppressive towards the female gender.
still some members of the movement of those years would not argue that any mediation, however, been no way to enumerate the achievements of women's rights in a sort of spoils of war, the result of a revolution of slaves rose up against the master ( as that does not involve and, in this view, likely to be excluded, and perhaps "Punish").
We do not know nor can we ever know how the men, the single breadwinner of the time, have experienced divorce and the entry of the new menage in gender relations in the law, as we know nothing about the subsequent penetration of a capillary totally new and versatile costume into Italian society. We can only see that the male attitude was certainly characterized by a marked passivity.
From the perspective of the reform of family law everything hinges on the introduction of legislation that made it possible separation and divorce. Then Divorce also be read as a symptom of social change that could not wait. The divorce also and especially as a tool to support undeclared instances feminists is a consideration that can make us aware that in the subsequent course of history on stage and there was only only women. But what were the questions from the female to the company 'calendar? Among them was definitely the talk of equal rights and equal opportunity ', there was a desire to deconstruct and there were also many other roles millennial requests. The more diverse. The most articulate. All evolving as the years have passed then.
The origin of these instances was different then because over time the compactness of feminism was less and it is divided into many different strands each offering a different tolerance to the wake of strong roles for men and women who remained and continues to exist. Since then feminism feminisms that were born with different movements and planning applications' originated from different women's movement years 60/70.
Broadly The path 'from feminism to feminism was that while, as regards the slope of the "divorce", we can see that at first it was really an alternative choice and that very few people decided to leave legally: why some forced by moral duties, because they saw no other alternative to the family of origin.
Today it is not so and while divorce is synonymous with individual freedom, the other also scared because it has become clear to everyone (as it has gained strength in the individual consciousness of historical change) that today interpersonal relationships are bound to end. The rest of the ISTAT data confirm this: in fifteen years, divorces have tripled. In 1995 there were 80 marriages per thousand in 2005 had risen to 150, reaching 273 fee for every thousand marriages in 2007. To make it clearer every year about 200 000 families come apart.
E 'nineties , ie within 20 years after the introduction of divorce law, that we witness first hand the "reactions" male.
born in 1988, the ISP (Institute for Fatherhood Studies), founded by journalist Maurizio Quilici. It is an organization with "the scientific and cultural" in order to promote the "culture of fatherhood and all the psychological, educational, social, biological, historical and legal related." Thereafter, and also in connection conl'ISP, since 1991, starting to make their appearance the first movements of separated parents. The first movement bearing the name of "Association of Separated Fathers" (APS) was born in Rimini in the fall of 1991 by industrialist Alberto Sartini, and two years later, Marino T-shirt, a physicist at the University of Florence, founded the National Association Growing Together . In Naples in 1992, under the guidance of prof. Bruno Schettini, sees the light of the Association of Separated Parents "(Ge.Se.). The following years saw also the birth of several groups of fathers. In the spring of 1994 was founded "Dad Separate Milano" - Association for the protection of the rights of children in separation "- under the guidance of Eng. Ernesto Emanuele. Rome was founded Gesef (Parents separated from their children) whose first president was Elio Torelli. From the movement of Ernesto Emanuele, 30 April 1998, was born in Naples, the association "Dad Separate" (APS) was founded by dr. Alessandro Ciardiello, which now is characterized by a constant spread throughout the territory, and soon became the National Association (ANPS). In 1999 the Association was born Separate Mothers, on the initiative of President Rosy Genduso.
The vast panorama of the associations of separated parents, however, shows that even here the separation is the key paradox in which, trying to tackle a problem, it is exasperating: the same separated fathers often prove incapable of effective coalitions and can only be separated with each other because everyone wants to drive and if it can not come off. Few are willing to admit this dynamic, however, all of which the militants have so much knowledge, however, that at the beginning of March 2008 shows the winning proposal for the establishment of a new form of association in order to compensate for the excessive fragmentation of the groups of separated parents.
A few years ago it is thought to create a new entity: an association of associations that would make a trap for relations with media and institutions. Moreover, the new entity would have been able to develop new proposals for amendments legislation to be submitted to Parliament, or give strength to those already made by other associations. The birth of Adiantum takes shape June 12, 2008, during the Symposium Nisida, when eight groups signed a memorandum of understanding for the birth of the National Association for the Protection of the Child (Adiantum).
We have therefore come to talk about what is happening now. In fact, after a gradual realization on the part of satellite movements (ideally the satellite initial movement that was promoted by divorce), exist and are increasingly conscious of the associations of parents living on their skin and that of their children's issues more negative biased and flawed legislation that imposed rules often inhumane to divorce. These national associations and clubs with ever more conviction and determination lay at the heart of the problem "marital separation" the children. Yeah, them! The children in separations were forgotten by the players, spectators feminism (and author of the first rules engine) and that in its anxiety to the achievement of women's rights, apparently had roughly removed from reality ', often relegating them in pockets of immense suffering.
But feminism who initially had smoothed the way for good has never been able to integrate and digest instances, although late, is relegated to the totality of man's world 'of cases in a new kind of resistance to be killed.
In America we live where everything is staged well in advance an attempt to define and "control" the phenomenon gives prominence to the "backlash" of feminism, the so-called backlash. Susan Faludi, feminist writer and U.S. analyzes the American phenomenon.
Today fathers the (but also many mothers!) Claiming a right to famigllia closer to their children, these associations appear to live the same "lucky" season when he lived feminism, denouncing the lack of women's rights, the company had 'practically civil white paper. associations parents separate report on the scene - as the main character - CHILDREN and are (does not ring true!) On the other side of the fence a women's movement turned in on itself and therefore will hardly 'be entitled to advance instances for children given the fact that in forty years of their children's lives, feminism has never spoken only in the light of repeated instances early always in favor of adult female.
in between the gap between individual needs, claims men's and women's extremism, seems the best way to create social tensions that a lot at stake if we are not able to meet around a table are likely to drag the whole society 'all 'inside of a vortex in which who is the master and hatred existing between one kind and another, and stirred.
Apart from cases in which what 'that dominates is the existence of discomfort is not easily interpretable and therefore ascribed to the group of rapture individual who deals with family violence is determined to consider the social fabric and to search for what it is in it because of the spread of new and disturbing phenomena such as false accusations, one of the causes, often, violence. The problem of stolen children and the de-legitimization of the father, rape, psychological and relational generated dallinterruzione legal parental project. All this contribute a few observations and many studies to indicate that to cause the murders within the family is not the inability to face the end of a relationship, but rather 'the existing discrimination between appartenentiu subject to different genders. The murders occur at 98.7% in couples with children, but not at the time of separation when one parent is hurt by the other as parental figure. And then, subsequently, other data such as the one who wants that 30% of separations involving allegations of crimes intrafamiari and that 80% of these allegations prove to be unfounded: a strategy, the fastest way to get rid of the other person, capable of creating such resentment and implacable hatred of dust ready to explode.
These deaths are therefore the result of hatred and misandry moves by politicians and fanatics who are experts or improvise executioners to silence the voices of men seeking opportunities' that are true. Request that it be respected as well as their natural right of paternity '.
" The Father is an important figure present, as is the Mother, the archetypal psyche of all, a figure who guides us into the world without rules by which we lost, which gives us the ability to process pain, and that gives us strength in our estimation themselves, and gives us the desire and the possibility of looking up, and more, searching for new domains and new dimensions to be addressed "
and conflict that produces an infinite strip of blood will not find 'rest if we are not able to respond to all instances trying to harmonize them and for what mediarle reality 'everyday can' help.
Quaranta years. A generation or so to go and find her father, the children and their key roles in the growth of our civilization as well as any '. Forty years to re-evaluate their reasons and their wealth. Forty years to replace the father and sons in the living fabric of our tired (but only occasionally and for limited periods of time) distracted society '.
[Source http://www.comunicazionedigenere.it/2011/01/10/i-frutti-del-backlash-la-scia-di-sangue-nutrita-di-neofemminismo/ ]
0 comments:
Post a Comment